Astronomy Practice Exam 2025 – Complete Preparation Guide

The key limitation of scientific inquiry highlighted in the context of scientific knowledge is the challenge posed by the evolution of existing ideas based on new findings. Science is a dynamic and iterative process where theories and concepts are continually tested and refined as new data emerges. This means that established ideas can be modified or replaced if new evidence contradicts them, indicating the provisional nature of scientific knowledge.

The essence of scientific inquiry lies in its capacity to adapt and evolve. This flexibility, while a strength in advancing understanding, can also be seen as a limitation because it reinforces the idea that no theory is ever completely settled or absolute. Instead, the temporary acceptance of scientific theories depends on the current understanding of evidence, which may vary over time with new discoveries.

This aspect contrasts with other options which either misinterpret the foundational principles of scientific inquiry or do not address the fluidity inherent in scientific discourse. For example, the notion that scientific theories are difficult to falsify does not capture the critical aspect of scientific rigor that actively seeks to test and falsify hypotheses. Similarly, the assertion that scientific knowledge is not subject to change overlooks the fundamental nature of science as a self-correcting process. Finally, suggesting that scientific inquiry relies solely on accepted facts discounts the role of hypotheses, experimentation,